Partager

By Date


  • 17-November-2021

    English

    Peer Review of the Automatic Exchange of Financial Account Information 2021

    The Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes is a multilateral framework for tax transparency and information sharing, within which over 160 jurisdictions participate on an equal footing. The Global Forum monitors and peer reviews the implementation of the international standards of Exchange of Information on Request (EOIR) and Automatic Exchange of Information (AEOI). AEOI provides for the automatic exchange of a predefined set of financial account information between tax authorities on an annual basis in order to assist them in ensuring the correct amount of tax is paid. To ensure the AEOI standard is fully effective, the Global Forum carries out a review of each jurisdiction’s domestic and international legal frameworks to ensure they are complete, and a review of the effectiveness of the implementation of the standard in practice. This report presents the latest conclusions of the peer reviews of the legal frameworks put in place by each jurisdiction to implement the AEOI standard. The results relate to the 102 jurisdictions that committed to commence AEOI from 2017, 2018 or 2019. A summary is also provided of the Global Forum’s reviews of the effectiveness in practice of the implementation of the standard, the results of which are expected to be published in 2022.
  • 5-novembre-2021

    Français

    Lutte contre la délinquance fiscale ‒ les dix principes mondiaux, deuxième édition

    Publié pour la première fois en 2017, le rapport intitulé Lutte contre la délinquance fiscale : les dix principes mondiaux constitue le premier guide d’envergure sur la lutte contre la délinquance fiscale. Il définit dix grands principes juridiques, institutionnels, administratifs et opérationnels à mettre en œuvre pour établir un système efficient et efficace permettant de repérer, d’enquêter et de poursuivre les délits fiscaux, tout en respectant les droits des suspects. Cette deuxième édition traite de nouvelles questions, comme la lutte contre les professionnels qui facilitent les délits fiscaux et la criminalité en col blanc, ainsi que le renforcement de la coopération internationale pour le recouvrement des avoirs. S'appuyant sur l’expérience de juridictions du monde entier, le rapport met également en lumière des réussites dans la lutte contre l’utilisation abusive d'actifs virtuels, les enquêtes complexes associant des équipes conjointes et le recours aux nouvelles technologies pour réprimer les délits fiscaux et les autres délits financiers. Les dix principes mondiaux constituent une composante essentielle du Dialogue d’Oslo mené par l’OCDE, une approche à l’échelle de l’administration dans son ensemble destinée à lutter contre les délits fiscaux et les flux financiers illicites. Ce document principal est complété par 33 chapitres par pays, qui décrivent en détail le cadre de lutte contre les délits fiscaux dans chaque juridiction ainsi que les progrès accomplis dans la mise en œuvre des Dix principes mondiaux. Ces rapports sont disponibles en ligne séparément.
  • 18-octobre-2021

    Français

    Déclaration pays par pays – Recueil 2021 de rapports d’examen par les pairs (version abrégée) - Cadre Inclusif sur le BEPS : action 13

    Dans le cadre du standard minimum de l’action 13, les juridictions se sont engagées à favoriser la transparence fiscale en demandant aux plus grands groupes d’entreprises multinationales de fournir la répartition globale de leurs revenus, impôts et autres indicateurs du lieu de l’activité économique. Ces informations sans précédent sur les opérations de ces groupes à travers le monde renforceront les capacités d’évaluation des risques des autorités fiscales. Le standard minimum de l’action 13 a été traduit dans des termes de référence spécifiques et une méthodologie aux fins du processus d’examen par les pairs. L’examen par les pairs du standard minimum de l’action 13 se déroule annuellement, avec déjà quatre revues annuelles effectuées en 2017, 2018, 2019 et 2020. Chaque examen annuel est consacré à différents aspects des trois éléments fondamentaux soumis à examen : le cadre juridique et administratif national, le cadre d’échange de renseignements, ainsi que la confidentialité et l’usage approprié des déclarations pays par pays. Ce rapport annuel d'examen par les pairs reflète les résultats du quatrième examen qui a examiné tous les aspects de la mise en œuvre. Il contient l’examen de 132 juridictions qui ont fourni des législations ou des informations relatives à la mise en œuvre de la déclaration pays par pays. Le présent recueil inclut les versions en français des rapports d’examen des pays francophones suivants : la Belgique, le Bénin, le Cameroun, le Canada, la Côte d’Ivoire, Djibouti, la France, le Gabon, Haïti, le Luxembourg, le Maroc, Maurice, la Principauté de Monaco, la République démocratique du Congo, le Sénégal, les Seychelles, la Suisse et la Tunisie.
  • 18-October-2021

    English

    Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Hong Kong, China (Stage 2) - Inclusive Framework on BEPS: Action 14

    Under Action 14, countries have committed to implement a minimum standard to strengthen the effectiveness and efficiency of the mutual agreement procedure (MAP). The MAP is included in Article 25 of the OECD Model Tax Convention and commits countries to endeavour to resolve disputes related to the interpretation and application of tax treaties. The Action 14 Minimum Standard has been translated into specific terms of reference and a methodology for the peer review and monitoring process. The peer review process is conducted in two stages. Stage 1 assesses countries against the terms of reference of the minimum standard according to an agreed schedule of review. Stage 2 focuses on monitoring the follow-up of any recommendations resulting from jurisdictions' stage 1 peer review report. This report reflects the outcome of the stage 2 peer monitoring of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Hong Kong, China.
  • 18-October-2021

    English

    Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, People's Republic of China (Stage 2) - Inclusive Framework on BEPS: Action 14

    Under Action 14, countries have committed to implement a minimum standard to strengthen the effectiveness and efficiency of the mutual agreement procedure (MAP). The MAP is included in Article 25 of the OECD Model Tax Convention and commits countries to endeavour to resolve disputes related to the interpretation and application of tax treaties. The Action 14 Minimum Standard has been translated into specific terms of reference and a methodology for the peer review and monitoring process. The peer review process is conducted in two stages. Stage 1 assesses countries against the terms of reference of the minimum standard according to an agreed schedule of review. Stage 2 focuses on monitoring the follow-up of any recommendations resulting from jurisdictions' stage 1 peer review report. This report reflects the outcome of the stage 2 peer monitoring of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by the People's Republic of China.
  • 18-October-2021

    English

    Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Russian Federation (Stage 2) - Inclusive Framework on BEPS: Action 14

    Under Action 14, countries have committed to implement a minimum standard to strengthen the effectiveness and efficiency of the mutual agreement procedure (MAP). The MAP is included in Article 25 of the OECD Model Tax Convention and commits countries to endeavour to resolve disputes related to the interpretation and application of tax treaties. The Action 14 Minimum Standard has been translated into specific terms of reference and a methodology for the peer review and monitoring process. The peer review process is conducted in two stages. Stage 1 assesses countries against the terms of reference of the minimum standard according to an agreed schedule of review. Stage 2 focuses on monitoring the follow-up of any recommendations resulting from jurisdictions' stage 1 peer review report. This report reflects the outcome of the stage 2 peer monitoring of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by the Russian Federation.
  • 18-October-2021

    English

    Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Saudi Arabia (Stage 2) - Inclusive Framework on BEPS: Action 14

    Under Action 14, countries have committed to implement a minimum standard to strengthen the effectiveness and efficiency of the mutual agreement procedure (MAP). The MAP is included in Article 25 of the OECD Model Tax Convention and commits countries to endeavour to resolve disputes related to the interpretation and application of tax treaties. The Action 14 Minimum Standard has been translated into specific terms of reference and a methodology for the peer review and monitoring process. The peer review process is conducted in two stages. Stage 1 assesses countries against the terms of reference of the minimum standard according to an agreed schedule of review. Stage 2 focuses on monitoring the follow-up of any recommendations resulting from jurisdictions' stage 1 peer review report. This report reflects the outcome of the stage 2 peer monitoring of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Saudi Arabia.
  • 18-October-2021

    English

    Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Brazil (Stage 2) - Inclusive Framework on BEPS: Action 14

    Under Action 14, countries have committed to implement a minimum standard to strengthen the effectiveness and efficiency of the mutual agreement procedure (MAP). The MAP is included in Article 25 of the OECD Model Tax Convention and commits countries to endeavour to resolve disputes related to the interpretation and application of tax treaties. The Action 14 Minimum Standard has been translated into specific terms of reference and a methodology for the peer review and monitoring process. The peer review process is conducted in two stages. Stage 1 assesses countries against the terms of reference of the minimum standard according to an agreed schedule of review. Stage 2 focuses on monitoring the follow-up of any recommendations resulting from jurisdictions' stage 1 peer review report. This report reflects the outcome of the stage 2 peer monitoring of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Brazil.
  • 18-October-2021

    English

    Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Bulgaria (Stage 2) - Inclusive Framework on BEPS: Action 14

    Under Action 14, countries have committed to implement a minimum standard to strengthen the effectiveness and efficiency of the mutual agreement procedure (MAP). The MAP is included in Article 25 of the OECD Model Tax Convention and commits countries to endeavour to resolve disputes related to the interpretation and application of tax treaties. The Action 14 Minimum Standard has been translated into specific terms of reference and a methodology for the peer review and monitoring process. The peer review process is conducted in two stages. Stage 1 assesses countries against the terms of reference of the minimum standard according to an agreed schedule of review. Stage 2 focuses on monitoring the follow-up of any recommendations resulting from jurisdictions' stage 1 peer review report. This report reflects the outcome of the stage 2 peer monitoring of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Bulgaria.
  • 18-October-2021

    English

    Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Indonesia (Stage 2) - Inclusive Framework on BEPS: Action 14

    Under Action 14, countries have committed to implement a minimum standard to strengthen the effectiveness and efficiency of the mutual agreement procedure (MAP). The MAP is included in Article 25 of the OECD Model Tax Convention and commits countries to endeavour to resolve disputes related to the interpretation and application of tax treaties. The Action 14 Minimum Standard has been translated into specific terms of reference and a methodology for the peer review and monitoring process. The peer review process is conducted in two stages. Stage 1 assesses countries against the terms of reference of the minimum standard according to an agreed schedule of review. Stage 2 focuses on monitoring the follow-up of any recommendations resulting from jurisdictions' stage 1 peer review report. This report reflects the outcome of the stage 2 peer monitoring of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Indonesia.
  • 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 > >>