Share

Competition

Ex-post assessment of merger remedies

 

 8 December 2023  | 14.45-17.45 CETParis, France 

 

THE 2023 OECD GLOBAL FORUM ON COMPETITION WILL DISCUSS EX-POST ASSESSMENT OF MERGER REMEDIES

Merger control is an important part of any competition regime, and effective merger remedies are needed to ensure its efficacy. Remedies are a distinct process within merger control and represent a number of specific challenges that warrant careful consideration, including how remedies are designed as well as how they are implemented. Ex-post assessments of merger remedies allow competition authorities to look retrospectively at previous merger remedy decisions to review whether the remedy proceeded as expected or if things could have gone better. This enables competition authorities to refine and improve their practices and be confident in their decision making going forward.

In December 2023, the OECD Global Forum on Competition considered several aspects of ex-post assessments of merger remedies, including reviews that consider the implementation of the remedy as well as those that consider its design. It also discussed the need for them in competition authorities’ toolkits, and how best to implement them effectively according to the resources available. 

Key Takeaways from the roundtable

  • It is important that merger remedies are effective and ex-post assessments allow authorities to learn from experience and improve their practices. Other benefits of ex-post assessments of merger remedies can be to increase the credibility of an authorities work and allow them to demonstrate what does, or does not, work to a wider audience.
  • There is no “one size fits all” approach for ex-post assessments of merger remedies. Low cost methodologies still produce useful insights, although methodologies should fit the objective of the assessment and desired robustness of findings.
  • To aid further ex-post assessments of merger remedies, authorities could be given appropriate legal powers to gather information. The remedy process itself may also have the potential to be used to collect data through the imposition of reporting requirements.
  • Finally, many of the lessons from ex-post assessments are valuable to others and more could be done to ensure the learnings are shared with the wider competition community.

This page contains all related documentation.

See also the full list of OECD best practice roundtables on competition.

Read the background note

 

FORUM 2023

Global Forum home page

From Globalisation to Regionalisation

Alternatives to leniency programmes

Use of Economic Evidence in Cartel Cases

Documents

Call for contributions

Background note by the Secretariat 

Contributions from:

Brazil

Fiji

Georgia

Greece

Italy

Japan

Kazakhtan

Kenya

Mexico

Türkiye

United Kingdom

BIAC

Summaries of contributions

 

Speakers

William E. Kovacic Bio
Global Competition Professor of Law and Policy and Director, Competition Law Center, The George Washington University

John E. Kwoka Bio
Neal F. Finnegan Distinguished Professor of Economics, Northeastern University 

Amelia Fletcher CBE Bio 
Professor of Competition Policy, University of East Anglia  

Presentations 

 

 

Related links

Assessing and Communicating the Benefits of Competition Interventions, 2023
Reference Guide on Ex-post Evaluation of Competition Agencies’ Enforcement Decisions, 2016
Impact Evaluation of Merger Decisions, 2011
Remedies in Merger Cases, 2011
Merger Remedies, 2011
Recommendation on Merger Review, 2005

OECD Competition Youtube channel
Global Forum website
Full list of Competition Policy Roundtables

 

Related Documents