Share

Tax

book

Prevention of Tax Treaty Abuse – Fourth Peer Review Report on Treaty Shopping

Inclusive Framework on BEPS: Action 6

Under the BEPS Action 6 minimum standard on treaty shopping, members of the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS have committed to strengthen their tax treaties by implementing anti-abuse measures. This report reflects the outcome of the fourth peer review of the implementation of the BEPS Action 6 minimum standard on treaty shopping. It includes the aggregate results of the review and data on tax treaties concluded by each of the 139 members of the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS on 31 May 2021, and also contains the jurisdictional section for each member. This is the first peer review process governed by a revised peer review methodology.

Published on March 21, 2022Also available in: French

In series:OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Projectview more titles

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Foreword
Executive Summary
Implementation of the minimum standard: Aggregate data and key figures
Key role of the MLI
Plans for the implementation of the minimum standard and support provided to jurisdictions
Recommendations
Difficulties in implementing the minimum standard
Conclusion and next steps
Background on the Action 6 minimum standard and peer review
Jurisdictional Sections140 chapters available
Inclusive Framework members on 31 May 2021
Albania
Andorra
Angola
Anguilla
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Australia
Austria
The Bahamas
Bahrain
Barbados
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Benin
Bermuda
Bosnia-Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
British Virgin Islands
Brunei Darussalam
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Cabo Verde
Cameroon
Canada
Cayman Islands
Chile
China (People’s Republic of)
Colombia
Congo
Cook Islands
Costa Rica
Côte d’Ivoire
Croatia
Curaçao
Czech Republic
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican Republic
Egypt
Estonia
Eswatini
Faroe Islands
Finland
France
Gabon
Georgia
Germany
Gibraltar
Greece
Greenland
Grenada
Guernsey
Haiti
Honduras
Hong Kong (China)
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Ireland
Isle of Man
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jersey
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Korea
Latvia
Liberia
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macau (China)
Malaysia
Maldives
Malta
Mauritius
Mexico
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Montserrat
Morocco
Namibia
Netherlands
New Zealand
Nigeria
North Macedonia
Norway
Oman
Pakistan
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Poland
Portugal
Qatar
Romania
Russian Federation
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Samoa
San Marino
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sweden
Switzerland
Thailand
Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turks and Caicos Islands
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
United States
Uruguay
Viet Nam
Zambia
Powered by OECD iLibrary