Version française
Le présent recueil inclut les versions en français des rapports d'examen du Bénin, du Burkina Faso, du Congo, de la France, du Gabon, du Maroc, de la République démocratique du Congo et du Sénégal.
Previous editions
- 2021 Peer Review Reports – This report reflects the outcome of the fourth annual peer review of the implementation of the Action 5 minimum standard and covers 131 jurisdictions. It assesses implementation for the 1 January - 31 December 2021 period.
- 2019 Peer Review Reports – This report reflects the outcome of the fourth annual peer review of the implementation of the Action 5 minimum standard and covers 124 jurisdictions. It assesses implementation for the 1 January - 31 December 2019 period.
- 2018 Peer Review Reports – This report reflects the outcome of the third annual peer review of the implementation of the Action 5 minimum standard and covers 112 jurisdictions. It assesses implementation for the 1 January - 31 December 2018 period.
- 2017 Peer Review Reports – This report reflects the outcome of the second annual peer review of the implementation of the Action 5 minimum standard and covers 92 jurisdictions. It assesses implementation for the 1 January - 31 December 2017 period.
- 2016 Peer Review Reports – The first annual report on compliance with the transparency framework covers the jurisdictions which participated in the BEPS Project prior to the creation of the Inclusive Framework. It assesses implementation for the 1 January - 31 December 2016 period.
NEWS
COMPARE YOUR COUNTRY
Discover the international state of play with this interactive map presenting key indicators and outcomes of the OECD's work on international tax matters.
FURTHER INFORMATION
The Action 5 minimum standard consists of two parts. One part relates to preferential tax regimes, where a peer review is undertaken to identify features of such regimes that can facilitate base erosion and profit shifting, and therefore have the potential to unfairly impact the tax base of other jurisdictions. The second part includes a commitment to transparency through the compulsory spontaneous exchange of relevant information on taxpayer-specific rulings which, in the absence of such information exchange, could give rise to BEPS concerns.