Share

Korea

Korea - OECD Anti-Bribery Convention

 

Monitoring and evaluation

‌‌Korea's Phase 4 Monitoring Report

20/12/2018 - This report details Korea's achievements and challenges in respect to implementation and enforcement of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, as well as progress made since the Phase 3 evaluation in 2011. 

Download the full report l Extracts available in Korean

Read the news release l Also available in Korean

 

Korea's accession

4 January 1999
Deposit of instrument of ratification

5 March 1999
Entry into force of the Convention

15 February 1999
Entry into force of implementing legislation

     
Monitoring and peer review history

2021 Follow-up to Phase 4 report

2018 Phase 4 report l Extracts available in Korean

2014 Follow-up to Phase 3 report

2011 Phase 3 report

2007 Follow-up to Phase 2 report

2004 Phase 2 report

1999 Phase 1 report

 

News releases

2022 Recent legislative reforms raise serious concerns over Korea’s capacity to investigate and prosecute foreign bribery

2018 Korea must enhance detection and reinforce sanctions to boost foreign bribery enforcement, says OECD l Also available in Korean

2011 Korea making notable progress on fighting foreign bribery; further improvements needed  

 

The OECD Anti-Bribery Convention

The OECD Anti-Bribery Convention establishes standards to criminalise bribery of foreign public officials in international business transactions.

Full text and related documents

All country reports

 

OECD Working Group on Bribery 

The OECD Working Group on Bribery in International Business Transactions is responsible for monitoring the implementation and enforcement of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, the 2021 Recommendation and related instruments. The Working Group is made up of representatives from the States Parties to the Convention and meets regularly.

Learn more about the Working Group

 

Monitoring and evaluation

Monitoring of implementation and enforcement of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention takes places in successive phases through a rigorous peer-review monitoring system. 


Description of each phase of evaluation

‌‌

 

 

Related Documents