Share

Publications & Documents


  • 15-September-2020

    Italian, PDF, 1,430kb

    TALIS 2018 Country Note Volume II - Italy (Italian)

    The OECD Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) is an international, large-scale survey of teachers, school leaders and the learning environment in schools. This note presents findings based on the reports of lower secondary teachers and their school leaders in mainstream public and private schools.

    Related Documents

  • 10-September-2020

    English, PDF, 858kb

    TALIS 2018 Country Note Volume II - Italy

    The OECD Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) is an international, large-scale survey of teachers, school leaders and the learning environment in schools. This note presents findings based on the reports of lower secondary teachers and their school leaders in mainstream public and private schools.

    Related Documents

  • 10-September-2020

    English

    Blockchain for SMEs and entrepreneurs in Italy

    This report investigates the development of the blockchain ecosystem in Italy, against the background of the SME and entrepreneurship structure and trends in the country. The report analyses in particular the characteristics and trends of companies introducing blockchain-based services in the Italian market, opportunities and challenges to their business development, sectors and firms being targeted, and relevance for enhancing digitalisation and productivity in the SME population at large. The report also illustrates recent trends in regulation and policy, and provides policy recommendations.
    Also AvailableEgalement disponible(s)

  • 27-July-2020

    English

    When the going gets tough, the tough get going: How economic regulators bolster the resilience of network industries in response to the COVID-19 crisis

    This policy brief was developed by the Secretariat of the OECD Network of Economic Regulators (NER) and is based on examples of practice submitted by members of the NER. It reviews emergency measures taken by economic regulators during the COVID-19 pandemic to ensure continuity of services in network sectors, as well as to adjust regulatory practices and adapt governance arrangements. It identifies long-term questions and implications of the crisis with regard to market structure, infrastructure investment and the role of regulators.

  • 24-June-2020

    English, PDF, 778kb

    Over the Rainbow? The Road to LGBTI Inclusion - How does Italy compare?

    This note provides a comprehensive overview of the extent to which laws in Italy and OECD countries ensure equal treatment of LGBTI people, and of the complementary policies that could help foster LGBTI inclusion.

    Related Documents

  • 29-May-2020

    English, PDF, 667kb

    Accessibilità dei servizi di assistenza a lungo termine tra gli anziani nell’area OCSE e UE - Focus

    Con il raddoppiamento della quota della popolazione di età superiore agli 80 anni previsto nell’area OCSE entro il 2050, un numero crescente di persone anziane avrà difficoltà a svolgere le attività quotidiane.

    Related Documents

  • 22-April-2020

    Italian, PDF, 1,624kb

    Coronavirus (COVID-19): Risposte di policy delle Regioni italiane per le PMI

    Questa nota è stata realizzata dal Centro OCSE di Trento per lo Sviluppo Locale, parte del Centro per l'Imprenditorialità, le PMI, le Regioni e le Città (CFE) dell'OCSE. La nota offre una raccolta preliminare delle risposte di policy adottate dalle regioni italiane a sostegno delle piccole e medie imprese (PMI) nel contesto della pandemia COVID-19.

    Related Documents

  • 22-April-2020

    English

    Italian regional SME policy responses

    The note provides a preliminary inventory of the policy responses adopted by the Italian regions to support small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Chapter 1 focuses on the repercussions on the Italian economy. Chapter 2 provides an overview of national policy responses. Chapter 3 explains the role regions play within Italy’s institutional setting regarding economic development, particularly SME policy. Chapter 4 provides a regional deep dive on the measures put in place by the regions to support SMEs during the pandemic. Chapter 5 provides a summary of the main findings. This working document will be periodically updated and enriched with further analytical insights in the coming weeks.

  • 14-April-2020

    English

    Synthesising good practices in fiscal federalism - Key recommendations from 15 years of country surveys

    The design of intergovernmental fiscal relations can help to ensure that tax and spending powers are assigned in a way to promote sustainable and inclusive economic growth. Decentralisation can enable sub-central governments to provide better public services for households and firms, while it can also make intergovernmental frameworks more complex, harming equity. The challenges of fiscal federalism are multi-faceted and involve difficult trade-offs. This synthesis paper consolidates much of the OECD’s work on fiscal federalism over the past 15 years, with a particular focus on OECD Economic Surveys. The paper identifies a range of good practices on the design of country policies and institutions related strengthening fiscal capacity delineating responsibilities across evels of government and improving intergovernmental co-ordination.

  • 9-April-2020

    English

    Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Italy (Stage 2) - Inclusive Framework on BEPS: Action 14

    Under Action 14, countries have committed to implement a minimum standard to strengthen the effectiveness and efficiency of the mutual agreement procedure (MAP). The MAP is included in Article 25 of the OECD Model Tax Convention and commits countries to endeavour to resolve disputes related to the interpretation and application of tax treaties. The Action 14 Minimum Standard has been translated into specific terms of reference and a methodology for the peer review and monitoring process. The peer review process is conducted in two stages. Stage 1 assesses countries against the terms of reference of the minimum standard according to an agreed schedule of review. Stage 2 focuses on monitoring the follow-up of any recommendations resulting from jurisdictions' stage 1 peer review report. This report reflects the outcome of the stage 2 peer monitoring of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Italy.
    • << < 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 > >>