Bulgaria

Education Policies for Students at Risk and those with Disabilities in South Eastern Europe - Bulgaria and Synthesis Report

Education Policies for Students at Risk and those with Disabilities in South Eastern Europe - Bulgaria and Synthesis Report in the local language.

Modal Estimates of Services Barriers

OECD Trade Policy Working Paper No. 51. This paper presents improved approaches to measurement of services barriers by using alternative weighting methods and improved econometric specifications.

Agricultural Policies in Non-OECD Countries: Monitoring and Evaluation 2007

These highlights contain extracts from the 2007 edition of the report, Agricultural Policies in Non OECD Countries: Monitoring and Evaluation 2007.

Enterprise Policy Performance Assessment (EPPA) for Bulgaria: 2004 Report

Prepared by the OECD and the EBRD in close consultation with the European Commission this report presents the 2004 edition of the Enterprise Policy Performance Assessment for Bulgaria.

Reviews of National Policies for Education Bulgaria: Science, Research and Technology

Topics covered include the legislative framework; institutional arrangements for research and teaching; budgeting mechanisms; regional and international co-operation including EU policy initiatives; and the impact of brain drain and ageing on human resources.

Influential evaluations: Evaluations the improved performance and impacts of development programs

When conducted at the right time, and when they focus on key issues of concern to policy makers and managers, and when the results are presented in a user-friendly format, evaluations can provide a highly cost-effective way to improve the performance and impact of development policies, programs and projects. But evaluations that fail these criteria may produce no useful results– even when they are methodologically sound. This report

Related Documents

• Influential Evaluations: Evaluations that Improved Performance and Impacts of Development Programs - case studies and lessons learned

Evaluaciones Influyentes: evaluaciones que mejoraron el desempeño y los efectos de los programas de desarrollo

FINALIDAD Cuando se realizan en el momento oportuno y centran la atención en cuestiones clave que preocupan a las autoridadesencargadas de formular las políticas y a los gerentes, y cuando los resultados se presentan en unformato de fácil comprensión para el usuario, las evaluaciones pueden ser un medio muy eficaz en función de los costos para mejorar el desempeño y los efectos de las políticas, programas y proyectos de desarrollo.

Evaluations Marquantes: Des évaluations qui ont contribué à améliorer les résultats et l'impact des programmes de développement

OBJECTIF Lorsqu’elles sont réalisées au moment opportun et portent sur des questions essentielles pour les décideurs et les gestionnaires et lorsque leurs conclusions sont présentées sous une forme facile à exploiter, les évaluations sont un outil d’un excellent rapport coût-efficacité pour améliorer les résultats et l’impact des politiques, des programmes et des projets de développement. En revanche, lorsque ces critères ne sont

Avaliações Influentes: Avaliações que Melhoraram o Desempenho e os Impactos de Programas de Desenvolvimento

Quando levadas a cabo na altura certa, e quando centradas em temas decisivos para decisores e gestores, e quando os resultados são apresentados num formato acessível, as avaliações podem facultar um forte e económico modo de aumentar o desempenho e impacto de projectos, programas e políticas de desenvolvimento. Mas as avaliações que falham estes critérios não produzem efeitos úteis, mesmo quando se apresentam metodologicamente

Influential Evaluations: Evaluations that Improved Performance and Impacts of Development Programs (Russian)

PURPOSE When conducted at the right time, and when they focus on key issues of concern to policy makers and managers, and when the results are presented in a user-friendly format, evaluations can provide a highly cost-effective way to improve the performance and impact of development policies, programs and projects. But evaluations that fail these criteria may produce no useful results– even when they are methodologically