These judgments concern occupational illness:

• No. 79: 7 August 2015 (PDF, 262 Ko) - The applicant – the same as in Case No. 72 – challenged the Secretary-General’s decision not to recognise the occupational nature of her illness. She requested her reinstatement and claimed damages on the basis of the moral injuries caused.

• No. 82: 21 May 2017 (PDF, 259kb) - The applicant – the same as in Cases No. 72 and No 79 – alleging irregular procedures, challenged the Secretary-General’s decision not to recognise the occupational nature of her illness. This request follows the decision of the Tribunal of 7 August 2015, which had found that the findings of the medical board were vitiated by an obvious material error and ordered that the question be ruled on again.

• No. 83: 21 May 2017 (PDF, 268kb) - The applicant, alleging procedural irregularities, challenged the Secretary-General’s decision not to recognise the occupational nature of her illness and requests a compensation in reparation of damages and moral prejudice suffered.