Review by the courts of the enforcement of competition law ensures that the enforcement process and decisions are lawful, the parties’ rights are observed and competition authorities’ discretion is defined. Parties should have access to impartial review of decisions by an independent adjudicator. The discussion at the 2010 and 2011 OECD roundtables on procedural fairness and transparency highlighted that an effective judicial review complements the internal procedures that competition authorities put in place to ensure due process, and contributes to guaranteeing the rule of law and ensuring the consistency and credibility of enforcement. The roundtable in June 2019 examined the review of enforcement decisions and investigation steps by courts, and referred to methods ensuring that courts have access to expertise in competition law and economics.
» Read the OECD background note » Executive Summary with key findings » Detailed Summary of the discussion » Assessing the Judicial Role in a Lawful System of Competition Enforcement by Judge Ian FORRESTER » The Standard of Review for Competition cases in Canada by Chief Justice Paul CRAMPTON » See full list of best practice roundtables on competition
INVITED SPEAKERS Paul CRAMPTON Bio Ian FORRESTER Bio Partner Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
KEY PAPERS Executive Summary with key findings • Detailed Summary of the discussion
CONTRIBUTIONS
|
|
RELATED BEST PRACTICE ROUNDTABLES Judicial Perspectives on Competition Law, 2017 Commitment Decisions in Antitrust Cases, 2016 Procedural Fairness and Transparency, 2011 Judicial Enforcement of Competition Law, 1996 Presenting Complex Economic Theories to Judges, 2008
|
RELATED TOPICS Abuse of dominance and monopolisation |
Related Documents