Share

Chile

Chile - OECD Anti-Bribery Convention

 

Monitoring and evaluation

‌Chile's Phase 4 Monitoring Report

20/12/2018 - This report details Chile's achievements and challenges in respect to implementation and enforcement of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, as well as progress made since the Phase 3 evaluation in 2014.  

Download the full report

 

Chile's accession

18 April 2001
Deposit of instrument of ratification

17 June 2001
Entry into force of the Convention

8 October 2002
Entry into force of implementing legislation

     
Monitoring and peer review history

2023 Phase 4 additional report

2021 Phase 4 Follow-Up report

2018 Phase 4 report

2016 Follow-up to Phase 3 report

2014 Phase 3 report

 

News releases

2018 Chile ups foreign bribery enforcement but flawed case resolutions are insufficient to ensure transparency and accountability

2017 Chile must conclude its current legislative reforms of the criminal sanctions regime and clarify its corporate liability framework to better combat foreign bribery

2014 Progress made but Chile should better detect and thoroughly investigate foreign bribery, says OECD

2007 OECD Working Group on Bribery expresses serious concerns about Chile's compliance with key provisions of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention

 

 

The OECD Anti-Bribery Convention

The OECD Anti-Bribery Convention establishes standards to criminalise bribery of foreign public officials in international business transactions.

Full text and related documents

All country reports

 

OECD Working Group on Bribery 

The OECD Working Group on Bribery in International Business Transactions is responsible for monitoring the implementation and enforcement of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, the 2021 Recommendation and related instruments. The Working Group is made up of representatives from the States Parties to the Convention and meets regularly.

Learn more about the Working Group

 

Monitoring and evaluation

Monitoring of implementation and enforcement of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention takes places in successive phases through a rigorous peer-review monitoring system. 


Description of each phase of evaluation

‌‌

 

Related Documents